< Minimum notice periods regarding operational changes >

1. a.Minimum number of weeks' notice typically provided to employees and their representatives prior to the implementation of significant operational changes that could substantially affect them.
2. b.For organizations with collective bargaining agreements, report whether the notice period and provisions for consultation and negotiation are specified in collective agreements.

< Occupational health and safety management system >

1. a.A statement of whether an occupational health and safety management system has been implemented, including whether:
   • ⅰ.the system has been implemented because of legal requirements and, if so, a list of the requirements;
   • ⅱ.the system has been implemented based on recognized risk management and/or management system standards/guidelines and, if so, a list of the standards/guidelines.
2. b. A description of the scope of workers, activities, and workplaces covered by the occupational health and safety management system, and an explanation of whether and, if so, why any workers, activities, or workplaces are not covered.

□Kansai Electric Power Group Integrated Report 2024

• 16-20P (Sustainability Promotion System and Materiality (Important Issues))
• 67-78P (Human Capital Strategy)
• 133-135P (Risk Management)

□Kansai Electric Power Group ESG Report 2024

• 3-12P (Sustainability management)
• 50-60P (Labor Practices)
• 61-63P (Occupational Health and Safety)

< Hazard identification, risk assessment, and incident investigation >

1. a.A description of the processes used to identify work-related hazards and assess risks on a routine and non-routine basis, and to apply the hierarchy of controls in order to eliminate hazards and minimize risks, including:
   1. ⅰ.how the organization ensures the quality of these processes, including the competency of persons who carry them out;
   2. ⅱ.how the results of these processes are used to evaluate and continually improve the occupational health and safety management system.
2. b.A description of the processes for workers to report work-related hazards and hazardous situations, and an explanation of how workers are protected against reprisals.
3. c.A description of the policies and processes for workers to remove themselves from work situations that they believe could cause injury or ill health, and an explanation of how workers are protected against reprisals.
4. d.A description of the processes used to investigate work-related incidents, including the processes to identify hazards and assess risks relating to the incidents, to determine corrective actions using the hierarchy of controls, and to determine improvements needed in the occupational health and safety management system.

< Occupational health services >

1. a.A description of the occupational health services' functions that contribute to the identification and elimination of hazards and minimization of risks, and an explanation of how the organization ensures the quality of these services and facilitates workers' access to them.

□Kansai Electric Power Group Integrated Report 2024

• 67-78P (Human Capital Strategy)

□Kansai Electric Power Group ESG Report 2024

• 61-63P (Occupational Health and Safety)

< Worker participation, consultation, and communication on occupational health and safety >

1. a.A description of the processes for worker participation and consultation in the development, implementation, and evaluation of the occupational health and safety management system, and for providing access to and communicating relevant information on occupational health and safety to workers.
2. b.Where formal joint management-worker health and safety committees exist, a description of their responsibilities, meeting frequency, decision-making authority, and whether and, if so, why any workers are not represented by these committees.

□Kansai Electric Power Group Integrated Report 2024

• 67-78P (Human Capital Strategy)

□Kansai Electric Power Group ESG Report 2024

• 50-60P (Labor Practices)
• 61-63P (Occupational Health and Safety)

< Worker training on occupational health and safety >

1. a.A description of any occupational health and safety training provided to workers, including generic training as well as training on specific work-related hazards, hazardous activities, or hazardous situations.

□Kansai Electric Power Group Integrated Report 2024

• 67-78P (Human Capital Strategy)

□Kansai Electric Power Group ESG Report 2024

• 61-63P (Occupational Health and Safety)

< Promotion of worker health >

1. a.An explanation of how the organization facilitates workers' access to non-occupational medical and healthcare services, and the scope of access provided.
2. b.A description of any voluntary health promotion services and programs offered to workers to address major non-work-related health risks, including the specific health risks addressed, and how the organization facilitates workers' access to these services and programs.

□Kansai Electric Power Group Integrated Report 2024

• 67-78P (Human Capital Strategy)

□Kansai Electric Power Group ESG Report 2024

• 50-60P (Labor Practices)

< Prevention and mitigation of occupational health and safety impacts directly linked by business relationships >

1. a.A description of the organization's approach to preventing or mitigating significant negative occupational health and safety impacts that are directly linked to its operations, products, or services by its business relationships, and the related hazards and risks.

□Kansai Electric Power Group Integrated Report 2024

• 67-78P (Human Capital Strategy)

□Kansai Electric Power Group ESG Report 2024

• 61-63P (Occupational Health and Safety)

< Workers covered by an occupational health and safety management system >

1. a.If the organization has implemented an occupational health and safety management system based on legal requirements and/or recognized standards/guidelines:
   1. ⅰ.the number and percentage of all employees and workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization, who are covered by such a system;
   2. ⅱ.the number and percentage of all employees and workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization, who are covered by such a system that has been internally audited;
   3. ⅲ.the number and percentage of all employees and workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization, who are covered by such a system that has been audited or certified by an external party.
2. b.Whether and, if so, why any workers have been excluded from this disclosure, including the types of worker excluded.
3. c.Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data have been compiled, such as any standards, methodologies, and assumptions used.

< Work-related injuries >

1. a.For all employees:
   1. ⅰ.The number and rate of fatalities as a result of work-related injury;
   2. ⅱ.The number and rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities);
   3. ⅲ.The number and rate of recordable work-related injuries;
   4. ⅳ.The main types of work-related injury;
   5. ⅴ.The number of hours worked.
2. b.For all workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization:
   1. ⅰ.The number and rate of fatalities as a result of work-related injury;
   2. ⅱ.The number and rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities);
   3. ⅲ.The number and rate of recordable work-related injuries;
   4. ⅳ.The main types of work-related injury;
   5. ⅴ.The number of hours worked.
3. c.The work-related hazards that pose a risk of high-consequence injury, including:
   1. ⅰ.how these hazards have been determined;
   2. ⅱ.which of these hazards have caused or contributed to high-consequence injuries during the reporting period;
   3. ⅲ.actions taken or underway to eliminate these hazards and minimize risks using the hierarchy of controls.
4. d.Any actions taken or underway to eliminate other work-related hazards and minimize risks using the hierarchy of controls.
5. e.Whether the rates have been calculated based on 200,000 or 1,000,000 hours worked.
6. f.Whether and, if so, why any workers have been excluded from this disclosure, including the types of worker excluded.
7. g.Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data have been compiled, such as any standards, methodologies, and assumptions used.

□Kansai Electric Power Group Integrated Report 2024

• 67-78P (Human Capital Strategy)

□Kansai Electric Power Group ESG Report 2024

• 50-60P (Labor Practices)

< Work-related ill health >

1. a.For all employees:
   1. ⅰ.The number of fatalities as a result of work-related ill health;
   2. ⅱ.The number of cases of recordable work-related ill health;
   3. ⅲ.The main types of work-related ill health.
2. b.For all workers who are not employees but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization:
   1. ⅰ.The number of fatalities as a result of work-related ill health;
   2. ⅱ.The number of cases of recordable work-related ill health;
   3. ⅲ.The main types of work-related ill health.
3. c.The work-related hazards that pose a risk of ill health, including:
   1. ⅰ.how these hazards have been determined;
   2. ⅱ.which of these hazards have caused or contributed to cases of ill health during the reporting period;
   3. ⅲ.actions taken or underway to eliminate these hazards and minimize risks using the hierarchy of controls.
4. d.Whether and, if so, why any workers have been excluded from this disclosure, including the types of worker excluded.
5. e.Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data have been compiled, such as any standards, methodologies, and assumptions used.

-

< Average hours of training per year per employee >

1. a.Average hours of training that the organization's employees have undertaken during the reporting period, by:
   1. ⅰ.gender;
   2. ⅱ.employee category.

□Kansai Electric Power Group Integrated Report 2024

• 67-78P (Human Capital Strategy)
• 139-140P (Financial Statements)

□Kansai Electric Power Group ESG Report 2024

• 50-60P (Labor Practices)

< Programs for upgrading employee skills and transition assistance programs >

1. a.Type and scope of programs implemented and assistance provided to upgrade employee skills.
2. b.Transition assistance programs provided to facilitate continued employability and the management of career endings resulting from retirement or termination of employment.

□Kansai Electric Power Group Integrated Report 2024

• 67-78P (Human Capital Strategy)

□Kansai Electric Power Group ESG Report 2024

• 50-60P (Labor Practices)
• 64-70P (Human Capital Development)

< Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews >

1. a.Percentage of total employees by gender and by employee category who received a regular performance and career development review during the reporting period.

□Kansai Electric Power Group Integrated Report 2024

• 67-78P (Human Capital Strategy)

□Kansai Electric Power Group ESG Report 2024

• 64-70P (Human Capital Development)

1. a.Percentage of individuals within the organization's governance bodies in each of the following diversity categories:
   1. ⅰ.Gender;
   2. ⅱ.Age group: under 30 years old, 30-50 years old, over 50 years old;
   3. ⅲ.Other indicators of diversity where relevant (such as minority or vulnerable groups).
2. b.Percentage of employees per employee category in each of the following diversity categories:
   1. ⅰ.Gender;
   2. ⅱ.Age group: under 30 years old, 30-50 years old, over 50 years old;
   3. ⅲ.Other indicators of diversity where relevant (such as minority or vulnerable groups).

< Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men >

1. a.Ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men for each employee category, by significant locations of operation.
2. b.The definition used for 'significant locations of operation'.

□Kansai Electric Power Group Integrated Report 2024

• 67-78P (Human Capital Strategy)

□Kansai Electric Power Group ESG Report 2024

• 50-60P (Labor Practices)

< Incidents of discrimination and corrective actions taken >

1. a.Total number of incidents of discrimination during the reporting period.
2. b.Status of the incidents and actions taken with reference to the following:
   1. ⅰ.Incident reviewed by the organization;
   2. ⅱ.Remediation plans being implemented;
   3. ⅲ.Remediation plans that have been implemented, with results reviewed through routine internal management review processes;
   4. ⅳ.Incident no longer subject to action.

< Operations and suppliers in which the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining may be at risk >

1. a.Operations and suppliers in which workers' rights to exercise freedom of association or collective bargaining may be violated or at significant risk either in terms of:
   1. ⅰ.type of operation (such as manufacturing plant) and supplier;
   2. ⅱ.countries or geographic areas with operations and suppliers considered at risk.
2. b.Measures taken by the organization in the reporting period intended to support rights to exercise freedom of association and collective bargaining.

< Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of child labor >

1. a. Operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of:
   1. ⅰ.child labor;
   2. ⅱ.young workers exposed to hazardous work.
2. b.Operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labor either in terms of:
   1. ⅰ.type of operation (such as manufacturing plant) and supplier;
   2. ⅱ.countries or geographic areas with operations and suppliers considered at risk.
3. c.Measures taken by the organization in the reporting period intended to contribute to the effective abolition of child labor.

< Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor >

1. a.Operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor either in terms of:
   1. ⅰ.type of operation (such as manufacturing plant) and supplier;
   2. ⅱ.countries or geographic areas with operations and suppliers considered at risk.
2. b. Measures taken by the organization in the reporting period intended to contribute to the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labor.

< Security personnel trained in human rights policies or procedures >

1. a.Percentage of security personnel who have received formal training in the organization's human rights policies or specific procedures and their application to security.
2. b.Whether training requirements also apply to third-party organizations providing security personnel.

< Incidents of violations involving rights of indigenous peoples >

1. a.Total number of identified incidents of violations involving the rights of indigenous peoples during the reporting period.
2. b.Status of the incidents and actions taken with reference to the following:
   1. ⅰ.Incident reviewed by the organization;
   2. ⅱ.Remediation plans being implemented;
   3. ⅲ.Remediation plans that have been implemented, with results reviewed through routine internal management review processes;
   4. ⅳ.Incident no longer subject to action.

< Operations with local community engagement, impact assessments, and development programs >

1. a.Percentage of operations with implemented local community engagement, impact assessments, and/or development programs, including the use of:
   1. ⅰ.social impact assessments, including gender impact assessments, based on participatory processes;
   2. ⅱ.environmental impact assessments and ongoing monitoring;
   3. ⅲ.public disclosure of results of environmental and social impact assessments;
   4. ⅳ.local community development programs based on local communities' needs;
   5. ⅴ.stakeholder engagement plans based on stakeholder mapping;
   6. ⅵ.broad based local community consultation committees and processes that include vulnerable groups;
   7. ⅶ.works councils, occupational health and safety committees and other worker representation bodies to deal with impacts;
   8. ⅷ.formal local community grievance processes.

< Operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts on local communities >

1. a.Operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts on local communities, including:
   1. ⅰ.the location of the operations;
   2. ⅱ.the significant actual and potential negative impacts of operations.

< New suppliers that were screened using social criteria >

1. a.Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria.

< Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken >

1. a.Number of suppliers assessed for social impacts.
2. b.Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts.
3. c.Significant actual and potential negative social impacts identified in the supply chain.
4. d.Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment.
5. e.Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment, and why.

< Political contributions >

1. a.Total monetary value of financial and in-kind political contributions made directly and indirectly by the organization by country and recipient/beneficiary.
2. b.If applicable, how the monetary value of in-kind contributions was estimated.

< Assessment of the health and safety impacts of product and service categories >

1. a.Percentage of significant product and service categories for which health and safety impacts are assessed for improvement.

< Incidents of non-compliance concerning the health and safety impacts of products and services >

1. a. Total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations and/or voluntary codes concerning the health and safety impacts of products and services within the reporting period, by:
   1. ⅰ.incidents of non-compliance with regulations resulting in a fine or penalty;
   2. ⅱ.incidents of non-compliance with regulations resulting in a warning;
   3. ⅲ.incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes.
2. b. If the organization has not identified any non-compliance with regulations and/or voluntary codes, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient.

< Requirements for product and service information and labeling >

1. a.Whether each of the following types of information is required by the organization's procedures for product and service information and labeling:
   1. ⅰ.The sourcing of components of the product or service;
   2. ⅱ.Content, particularly with regard to substances that might produce an environmental or social impact;
   3. ⅲ.Safe use of the product or service;
   4. ⅳ.Disposal of the product and environmental or social impacts;
   5. ⅴ.Other (explain).
2. b. Percentage of significant product or service categories covered by and assessed for compliance with such procedures.

< Incidents of non-compliance concerning product and service information and labeling >

1. a.Total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations and/or voluntary codes concerning product and service information and labeling, by:
   1. ⅰ.incidents of non-compliance with regulations resulting in a fine or penalty;
   2. ⅱ.incidents of non-compliance with regulations resulting in a warning;
   3. ⅲ.incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes.
2. b.If the organization has not identified any non-compliance with regulations and/or voluntary codes, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient.

< Incidents of non-compliance concerning marketing communications >

1. a.Total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations and/or voluntary codes concerning marketing communications, including advertising, promotion, and sponsorship, by:
   1. ⅰ.incidents of non-compliance with regulations resulting in a fine or penalty;
   2. ⅱ.incidents of non-compliance with regulations resulting in a warning;
   3. ⅲ.incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes.
2. b.If the organization has not identified any non-compliance with regulations and/or voluntary codes, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient.

< Substantiated complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data >

1. a.Total number of substantiated complaints received concerning breaches of customer privacy, categorized by:
   1. ⅰ.complaints received from outside parties and substantiated by the organization;
   2. ⅱ.complaints from regulatory bodies.
2. b.Total number of identified leaks, thefts, or losses of customer data.
3. c.If the organization has not identified any substantiated complaints, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient.